Carl Olsen

April Ankeny Legislative Forum

Audio from April 11, 2015 MODERATOR: Sir. CARL OLSEN: Yes, Sen­a­tor Whitver, can you tell me how you’re going to vote on the med­ical cannabis pro­gram and what we might need to do to get the House to adopt that? SENATOR JACK WHITVER: The cur­rent bill as is that great­ly, in my opin­ion, great­ly expands April Anke­ny Leg­isla­tive Forum

My Amendment to SF 484

On April 7, 2015, I met with Iowa sen­a­tors Jack Whitver and Charles Schnei­der to dis­cus pro­tect­ing Iowa cannabis patients from the unlaw­ful clas­si­fi­ca­tion of cannabis under the fed­er­al Con­trolled Sub­stances Act. Sen­a­tor Whitver gave me the fol­low­ing amend­ment he had cre­at­ed for me by the Leg­isla­tive Ser­vices Agency: !– clear floats –> Sen­ate File My Amend­ment to SF 484

Urbandale Legislative Forum

I attend­ed the leg­isla­tive forum on Sat­ur­day, Jan­u­ary 31, 2015, at the Urban­dale Cham­ber of Com­merce. The event was well-attend­ed and two med­ical cannabis advo­cates spoke out at the forum, Con­nie Nor­gart and Craig Miller, ask­ing for pro­duc­tion of cannabis in Iowa and expand­ing the list of con­di­tions for which it can be used. State Urban­dale Leg­isla­tive Forum

Pharmacy Board denies my petition again

Here are the events that took place on my peti­tion for mar­i­jua­na sched­ul­ing. First the sub­com­mit­tee report from Novem­ber 19, 2014. Here’s a link to a copy of the sub­com­mit­tee report. After the sub­com­mit­tee report was read, the fol­low­ing con­ver­sa­tion took place: EDWARD MAIER: So, that entire doc­u­ment is what the com­mit­tee has rec­om­mend­ed to Phar­ma­cy Board denies my peti­tion again

My Plan

Peo­ple are always ask­ing me what my plan is, so I’m going to try to explain. I made my plan in 2006, short­ly after the U.S. Supreme Court deci­sion in Gon­za­les v. Ore­gon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006). In Gon­za­les v. Ore­gon, the U.S. Supreme Court found that states make most of the med­ical deci­sion under My Plan

Response to the Board’s decision to Table my Petition

Carl Olsen 130 E. Auro­ra Ave. Des Moines, Iowa 50313–3654 Decem­ber 1, 2014 Iowa Board of Phar­ma­cy 400 SW Eighth Street, Suite E Des Moines, Iowa 50309–4688 To the Iowa Board of Phar­ma­cy: Thank you for con­sid­er­ing my peti­tion for mar­i­jua­na sched­ul­ing on Wednes­day, Novem­ber 19, 2014.  I would like to thank the mem­bers of the Response to the Board’s deci­sion to Table my Peti­tion

Ship of State (fools)

On Novem­ber 17, 2014, the Iowa Board of Phar­ma­cy held a pub­lic hear­ing on my peti­tion to have mar­i­jua­na removed from sched­ule 1 of the Iowa Uni­form Con­trolled Sub­stances Act.  Dale Wool­ery from the Governor’s Office of Drug Con­trol Pol­i­cy (ODCP), showed up to argue against me. Wool­ery takes full advan­tage of the fact that Ship of State (fools)

State administrative agencies must follow state law

On Wednes­day, Novem­ber 19, 2014, the Iowa Board of Phar­ma­cy vot­ed to delay the rul­ing on my peti­tion to have mar­i­jua­na reclas­si­fied in Iowa. The board vot­ed unan­i­mous­ly to rec­om­mend reclas­si­fi­ca­tion in 2010, so this is not some­thing new the board has not pre­vi­ous­ly con­sid­ered.  Unless the board votes to recon­sid­er that 2010 rec­om­men­da­tion, the State admin­is­tra­tive agen­cies must fol­low state law